Thursday, January 22, 2015

Essay: Crime and Justice in Ovid's Metamorphoses (Books 1-4)

Perseus vs Atlas
This image was found here, and it was made by Edward Burne-Jones

I enjoy reading literature, or at least tales, that are far removed from my era in order to get a sense of what “right” and “wrong” meant at the time of the story. In this way, I can get a view on the historical timeline of human morality. This is no different in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, which happens in a time close to the AD/BC changeover: while I know that these myths are made not to be entirely realistic, it still reflects the values and mindset at the time they were written.

The most obvious and overarching pillar of good and evil is the judgment of the Gods, despite how flawed they might appear to someone of a more modern background. The impulsive and brutal activities the Zeus visits on mortals is, on many occasions, nothing short of monstrous. From what I have read, he really is a proverbial force of nature that does anything he wants whenever he wants. This is the primary point of the first tale, which details the flood Zeus used to wipe out most of humanity because HE was not pleased with their behavior. Events like these do surprise me momentarily on each occasion, but at the same time Zeus is as random and whimsical as nature is in addressing the existence of life, and nature is all-powerful as Jupiter is. Ultimately, his will is law (until it involves the titans, but I won’t address that).

But as we leave the top rung on the chain of justice, we start to see another theme: patriarchy. We don’t even need to leave the circle of the Olympians to see this, because Hera does not outright blame her husband (at least in the featured books) for attacking/romancing mortal women or female magical beings (dryads and others). These encounters usually result in the woman bearing child, and by this time Hera has become aware. And she punishes these women, not only because she is a God and has the means to, but she blindly assumes they had some power over the matter. Or maybe she finds it easier to blame these women than to try and change her husband’s ways (?). There’s no mistake that Zeus rapes some of these women in some form. However, readers can take-heart in that amongst mortals, rape is indeed a very serious crime. Despite the prevalence of patriarchy, there are occasional exceptions like in the invocation of the amazon warriors (but they are not mentioned in these books).

So, at the level of the Gods at least, most anything they say or do is set in stone as “right.” However, even when there are quarrels among the Gods themselves, like in the tale of Mars and Venus, there is no point in the story that Ovid even hints at the Gods reconsidering their actions or their intentions on their own. The way the disputes among each other are solved is by action alone: only a God can stop a God, but only by force of action. And this theme does follow what I said before about Zeus, even pertaining to the lesser Olympians: they are elements of nature itself, sometimes they clash, and one must win over the other. But they do not have second thoughts about their intent.

As we go further down the formalities of right and wrong in Ovid’s work, we approach the gray-ish realm of mortal man and magical beings. This level of morality, crime and punishment, is much more civilized, which is not surprising. Human disputes are often settled by human action, and the same goes for the creatures and monsters. However, there are clashes between humans and creatures, which is where things can become a little messy. Examples of these kinds of interactions can be seen in the tales of Narcissus, and Perseus and Medusa.


A trend that I have noticed is that Ovid never really allows a pure-blooded human to hold will and precedence over a God or Titan, but he will permit this on rare occasion when it comes to half-mortals born from divine lineage. The most prominent example in these books is that of Perseus. He was born to a mortal mother, DanaĆ«, but she was got with child by Zeus who appeared to her as a ray of light. Half-mortals like Perseus allow Ovid to create well-balanced man vs God disputes, while still maintaining the real limitations that each character has. As a testament to this, using Medusa’s head, Perseus transforms Atlas the titan into stone in the form of a mountain. This comes after the fact that Atlas wanted Perseus to leave his land, but the half-mortal refused. In fairness, Perseus didn’t exactly react the most even-handedly by responding to a moderate retaliation due to trespassing with out-right murder.

The literature unit can be found here

No comments:

Post a Comment